A writer-editor-teacher’s quote of the week #167

Poetry of witness presents the reader with an interesting interpretive problem. We are accustomed to rather easy categories: “personal” and “political” poems— the former calling to mind lyrics of love and emotional loss, the latter indicating a partisanship that is considered divisive, even when necessary. The distinction between the personal and the political gives the political realm too much and too little scope; at the same time, it renders the personal too important and no important enough. If we give up the dimension of the personal, we risk relinquishing one of the most powerful sites of myopia, an inability to see how larger structures of the economy and state circumscribe, if not determine, the fragile realm of individuality.

We need a third term, one that can describe the space between the state and the supposedly safe havens of the personal. Let us call this space “the social.”

– from the “Introduction” to Against Forgetting: Twentieth-Century Poetry of Witness, edited by Carolyn Forché

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s